Every now and then, someone contacts me or staff at The Hamiltonian because they disagree with something a candidate, councillor, community leader, or other contributor has said in one of our interviews or articles. Sometimes, it's a comment on Facebook.
That is completely fair.
People are entitled to disagree. Healthy disagreement is part of what makes democracy work.
What some may not realize, however, is that The Hamiltonian's role is not to referee every debate or investigate every claim made by every person who appears on our platform. Our role is to provide a space where people can speak, share their views, and engage in the public conversation.
If we attempted to go back and forth with everyone who objected to something that was said, we would spend all of our time debating the content and very little time producing it.
The Hamiltonian is operated with limited resources, and those resources are best spent creating opportunities for Hamiltonians to hear directly from the people who wish to represent them, lead them, or influence public life.
That does not mean we are dismissing criticism. Far from it. We welcome thoughtful feedback and appreciate hearing different perspectives.
But there comes a point where readers, voters, and residents must be trusted to do what thoughtful citizens have always done: listen, question, research, compare viewpoints, and draw their own conclusions.
Our job is not to tell people what to think.
Our job is to help ensure they have something worth thinking about.
Cal